Maria Kapajeva
- Born Estonia, lives and works in London
- BA in Economics, University of Tartu; BA in Photography at The University for the Creative Arts; MA in Photography at The University of Westminster.
- Fellow of HEA, teaches at UCA (Farnham)
- Cultural identity and gender issues within historical and contemporary contexts.
- Works with stories and histories from collection of vernacular photography. Also works with video, installation and object-based art.
Nigel Shafran
- UK, 1964– .
- Photographer and artist. Work exhibited at Tate and the Victoria and Albert Museum. Worked as a fashion photographer in 1980s before turning to fine art.
- Publications include Ruthbook (1995), Dad’s Office (1999), Edited Photographs 1992-2004 (2004), Flower’s for ___ (2008), Ruth on the phone (2012), Teenage Precinct Shoppers (2013), Visitor Figures (2015), Dark Rooms (2016), and The people on the street (2018).
- ” In photographing everyday elements and details, Shafran captures something of the fabric of our lives, the background noise that usually goes unnoticed, but which shapes us and our fate” (Everyday beauty, 2018).
Response
Yes, it did surprise me when I saw the image from Washing Up in the course manual that the photographer was a man. There is no reason why a man should not take such a picture, but I think it is fair to say that women photographers have more often taken pictures in the home, especially those connected with domestic tasks or rituals.
I am not entirely sure how to answer whether gender contributes to an image, except that I suppose it must: perhaps not so much in the choice of subject matter or technique, but more in the way that every creation springs from a context (the artist as a gendered creator) and is viewed within another context or narrative (the viewer as a gendered interpreter). I don’t think that this automatically determines the intent or the understanding of a work, but it would be hard to deny the presence or influence of gendered constructs.
The line of questioning in the course manual could serve to underline that viewers of the images may make certain assumptions about the person who created them and the situation within which they were created. Perhaps. What is more interesting to me is how humans are present to us in the things of their lives and in the way they order them. (Is it a clean kitchen? Is it orderly? What kind of food is prepared there? What social standing might be implied by the setting? Are there other clues as to the people who live here?) The setting is the stage of domestic life and it invites speculation about the actors who set the scene and perform there.
So yes, these are interesting still life compositions. I am naturally curious about other people and how they live. What are they telling me? How are they like me? How are they different from me?
References
Everyday beauty with Nigel Shafran (2018) At: https://www.bjp-online.com/2018/05/shafraninterview/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).
FK Artist – Maria Kapajeva (s.d.) At: https://fkmagazine.lv/2016/09/22/fk-artist-maria-kapajeva/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).
Interview with Maria Kapajeva (s.d.) At: https://ostseemag.com/portfolio/interview-maria-kapajeva/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).
Maria Kapajeva (s.d.) At: https://fastforward.photography/people/maria-kapajeva/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).
Maria Kapajeva | (s.d.) At: http://www.mariakapajeva.com/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).
Nigel Shafran (s.d.) At: http://nigelshafran.com/ (Accessed 11/11/2019a).
Nigel Shafran (s.d.) At: https://frieze.com/speaker/nigel-shafran (Accessed 11/11/2019b).
O’Hagan, S. (2018) ‘The photobook about homelessness – without a single rough sleeper’ In: The Guardian 11/12/2018 At: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/dec/11/photobook-homelessness-rough-sleeper-nigel-shafran-people-street (Accessed 11/11/2019).
Watch: BPB16 Nigel Shafran in conversation with Francis Hodgson (2017) At: https://photoworks.org.uk/watch-bpb16-nigel-shafran-conversation-francis-hodgson/ (Accessed 11/11/2019).